Noynoy Screws up the Scarborough Shoals Issue | Asia Sentinel
Asia Sentinel, 21 September 201
Philippine president dispatches loose cannon to Beijing, gets wounded
President Benigno S. Aquino III is enjoying a surge of popularity at
home, with a 78 percent approval rating against only 4 percent
negatives, but his latest foray into foreign policy and relations with
China has made the Philippines look silly abroad.
The gambit has also shown some of its politicians to be more interested
in domestic political games than in seriously representing the nation in
dealings with its giant neighbor. It also suggests that Aquino is
two-faced about the seas issues, claiming to take a tough line to defend
Philippine waters while cozying up to those wanting peace with China at
any price.
In an attempt to calm relations with Beijing in the wake of China’s
effective seizure of the Scarborough (Panatag) shoal, which lies 120
miles off the coast of Luzon, and deny its rich fishing grounds to
Philippine fishing boats Aquino decided on a back-door approach. But
instead of entrusting this mission to a seasoned diplomat, or even a
well-regarded politician he somehow chose Senator Antonio Trillanes IV, a
41-year-old first-term senator who is better known for having led a
failed coup attempt in 2003 against then-President Gloria Macapagal
Arroyo. Trillanes, then a senior grade lieutenant, led 321 soldiers to
take control of the Oakwood Towers in Makati City to protest government
graft and corruption. He was detained after the mutiny was quelled and
spent seven years in prison.
Trillanes claimed to have very good contacts in China, although why that
should be has not been explained. However he was given the imprimatur
as the President’s back-channel envoy and dispatched to Beijing in
August. Despite his lack of proven credentials, the naïve Aquino had
been listening to Trillanes for several months and allowed him to go
despite knowing that the senator, who was the first lawmaker eve to be
elected from his jail cell, was known to be hostile to Foreign Minister
Albert del Rosario. He had been quoted in July as saying that Rosario
was a “war freak” anxious to obtain US help and thereby worsen relations
with China.
Once in Beijing, according to notes of a meeting with him believed taken
by Sonia Brady, the Philippine ambassador to China, Trillanes appeared
to act more as a Manchurian candidate than an envoy trying to smooth
relations with China without compromising the Philippine stance on the
shoal, which lies well within the Philippines Exclusive Economic Zone.
He expressed strong disagreement with Philippine official policy.
Trillanes thus completely undercut the role of Foreign Minister del
Rosario who complained that back channeling could be useful in some
circumstances but in this case was counterproductive. Del Rosario was
forced to defend himself publicly against Trillanes and got no support
from Aquino, who kept quiet about the whole mess he created.
Malacanang suggested the fuss was mainly a feud between senators, with
Senator Juan Ponce Enrile accusing Trillanes of being a traitor.
Trillanes then attacked Manuel Pangilinan, one of the country’s top
businessmen, for allegedly encouraging closer US involvement, fanning
del Rosario’s alleged anti-China stance and having ulterior motives
relating to oil interests on the Recto bank.
Pangilinan was naturally infuriated and threatened to move his
operations to Hong Kong, where his First Pacific is a major investment
management and holding company with operations in telecommunications,
infrastructure, food products and natural resources.
Aquino himself tried and failed to meet Chinese President Hu Jintao at
the recent APEC summit in Vladivostok, hoping to discuss the
jurisdiction issue but in the wider context of China-Philippine
relations.
So now, in the wake of the Trillanes mess, Aquino has had to send
Interior Secretary and former Senator Mar Roxas as his special envoy to
meet Xi Jinping, President Hu’s heir-apparent.
But the whole episode has shown that while Aquino may be honest and
likable his judgments of people and issues leaves much to be desired.
And it shows how China must see the Philippines as a pushover, with
nationalist rhetoric always undercut by politicians with pecuniary or
political interests which transcend the national interest.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment