Malaysia's UMNO Goes After A Critic | Asia Sentinel
 John Berthelsen, 06 September 201
Never mind 150 million euros in bribes, a dead woman and a global scandal, go for the whistle-blower's throat
In November of 2009, Suaram, the Kuala Lumpur-based human rights NGO,
 asked a French investigative law firm to look into what appeared to be 
huge bribes and kickbacks paid to Malaysian politicians by the French 
state-owned defense company DCN and its subsidiaries for the 2002 
purchase of two submarines and the lease of a third. 
The story was complicated by the sensational 2006 death of a Mongolian 
translator and party girl, Altantuya Shaariibuu, who was shot by two of 
then-Defense Minister Najib Tun Razak’s bodyguards and her body was 
blown up with military explosives. While the bodyguards were convicted 
of her for-hire killing, the court appeared to have actively suppressed 
any mention of who allegedly paid the two to kill her, raising Suaram’s 
concerns that there would be no justice delivered.
In the intervening three years, Suaram’s request to the law firm, headed
 by the Paris-based William Bourdon, resulted in a probe that exposed 
nearly 150 million euros in questionable funds paid to a close friend of
 Najib Tun Razak, now Malaysia’s prime minister. 
Eventually, when a Paris-based investigating magistrate began to examine
 the evidence, the court turned up voluminous memos, emails and other 
documents from a raid on DCN’s offices indicating that massive bribes 
had been paid with the full knowledge of Alain Juppe, the French foreign
 minister, Mahathir Mohamad, then the prime minister of Malaysia, and 
Najib, who had negotiated the purchase.  The evidence detailed a host of
 other sleazy dealings. 
Some 133 documents listing the alleged criminal dealings were obtained independently by Asia Sentinel and posted here on June 25
 on the Internet. Although the documents are in French, those who do not
 speak the language can get them onto their computer screens and click 
on Google Translate.  While the grammar is somewhat primitive, their 
meaning is very clear.   Those who do not want to bother may read two 
stories that Asia Sentinel published on the subject on 25 June.  They 
can be found here and here.  
The publication of the documents kicked off a storm in France and 
Malaysia. But what the publication of the French documents or the 
investigation did not do was spur any probe of the purported criminal 
activities in Malaysia.  
What it did do, however, was to precipitate an unprecedented attack by a
 wide range of pro-government bloggers, ruling coalition politicians and
 others on the reputation and integrity of Suaram, and by extension 
against Asia Sentinel for printing the documents. 
Suaram, an acronym for Suara Rakyat Malaysia, or Voice of the Malaysian 
People, was born in the wake of the infamous 1987 Operation Lalang 
ordered by Mahathir to use the Internal Security Act to jail 108 
opposition members, union officials, activists and others. Suaram was 
created to work for the abolishment of the ISA and to protect the rights
 of those who had been jailed and others like them.  Suaram insists that
 it is a nonpartisan organization although its leaders do include many 
opposition members including Kua Kia Soong, a former Democratic Action 
Party member of parliament who was detained for more than a year under 
the ISA, Syed Husin Ali, currently deputy president of Parti Keadilan 
Rakyat, Anwar’s party, and many others.  
Cynthia Gabriel, the Suaram director, has particularly borne the brunt 
of the attacks.  “If you ask me, they are spinning, just spinning, 
blackening our name, attempting to cause disrepute so that the public 
will lose trust in us,” Gabriel said in an interview.
In particular, she said, her organization has been falsely accused of 
money laundering and terrorism by a lawyer for the ruling United Malays 
National Organization. 
In addition, Ismail Sabri Yaakob, the domestic trade, cooperatives and 
consumerism minister and a prominent member of the United Malays 
National Organization, also called the reform organization’s accounts 
were “highly suspicious” and demanded an investigation. Accordingly, 
Suaram has become a target for Malaysia’s Companies Commission, the 
Social Security Administration, UMNO, the Inland Revenue, the 
controversial Malay supremacy organization Perkasa, and the UMNO-owned 
newspapers Utusan Malaysia and the New Straits Times, Gabriel said. 
In July the companies commission attempted to raid Suaram’s offices – 
without a valid warrant -- despite the fact that the NGO had already 
agreed to produce all the documents required for the commission’s 
investigation.
Suaram reaffirmed its intent to cooperate with the authorities for 
documents although the companies commission has neither asked for the 
documents nor notified the organization it was under investigation. That
 was followed by the Social Security Administration’s demand on Aug. 3 
to produce a list of documents by Aug. 30 although the officer in charge
 was “clueless to our presence even after being shown the letter sent to
 us which was signed off by none other than himself,” Suaram said in a 
press release signed by Nalini Elumalai, the organization’s executive 
director.
One blog, “the Unspinners,” accused Suaram of being an agent of the US 
Central Intelligence Agency, presumably to overthrow the country, and of
 “foreign subversion” despite the fact that Malaysia is one of the US’s 
staunchest allies in the region and that US soldiers train on its soil. 
The popular blog Rocky’s Bru, written by Ahirudin bin Attan, a former 
editor of a variety of UMNO-owned publications, spent days on the 
question of why Suaram and Asia Sentinel were publishing the documents. A
 flock of other blogs have asked the some questions. The Unspinners 
demanded that “Don't bullshit about the submarine case. Suaram have no 
proof and their facts are all wrong! They are slanderous.”
Unfortunately what none of the bloggers, politicians, government 
bureaucrats or newspapers have been able to refute is the 133 documents 
themselves that were presented by French police to the French 
investigating magistrate. They were not created by Suaram’s lawyers or 
Suaram or Asia Sentinel.  The bulk of them came from DCN’s files and 
they dealt with Malaysian contacts. They were presented to the court on 
April 7,2010 by investigators from the anti-organized crime unit of the 
French Directorate of Judicial Police, not Suaram, not Suaram’s lawyers 
and not by Asia Sentinel.  
Taken together, they reveal allegations of attempted blackmail, bribery,
 influence peddling, misuse of corporate assets and concealment, among 
other allegations, both in France and Malaysia. They tie Altantuya 
Shaariibuu to the case despite numerous protestations by the critics 
that she had never visited France or had anything to do with the 
submarine transaction.
The documents indicate that DCN and its subsidiaries steered the money 
to two companies controlled by Prime Minister Najib’s best friend, Abdul
 Razak Baginda, in contravention of the OECD convention on bribery by 
routing the money through companies controlled by Jean-Marie Boivin, the
 former DCN finance director, who stepped out of the defense contractor 
to in effect become the thin wall of insulation between DCN and the 
Malaysian officials who got the money.
As much as UMNO and the UMNO cronies would like to discredit Suaram, the
 one thing they can’t discredit is those documents. But they can 
certainly be expected to keep trying.   
(John Berthelsen is the editor of the Asia Sentinel)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment