ASEAN diplomacy all at sea | Phnom Penh Post
David Boyle, 03 August 2012
The headaches at number 3, Samdech Hun Sen Street, have just been
getting worse since the ASEAN summit at Phnom Penh’s Peace Palace in
June descended into an ungainly squabble.
Cambodian diplomats and
politicians at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs have found themselves
nose diving into a protracted bilateral dogfight with the Philippines –
that has many commentators crowing is unbefitting of the ASEAN chair.
How
Cambodia ended up trading barbs for weeks after the summit with a
country separated from it by Vietnam and more than 1,000 kilometres of
ocean has left many scratching their heads.
For the third time
this week a Cambodian ambassador yesterday publicly bought into the
dispute, which has raged over who was responsible for the failure of
ASEAN to issue a foreign ministers joint communiqué during the summit
for the first time in its 45-year history.
In The Japan Times
Online yesterday, Cambodia’s ambassador in Tokyo, Hor Monirath, rehashed
well-worn accusations that the Philippines and Vietnam had “hijacked”
the communiqué by insisting it specifically mentioned their bilateral
disputes with China over the South China Sea.
Cambodia’s
assertion that bilateral disputes were an inappropriate topic for the
communiqué has infuriated Manila, which counters that the hosts
obstinately thwarted any attempt to even negotiate over the contentious
sea.
The Philippines, Vietnam and a handful of other ASEAN
countries all make claims to the immensely valuable waters through which
about half the world’s shipping passes and which China argues belongs
almost entirely to them.
Officials at the Cambodian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and the Philippines Embassy in Phnom Penh were not
available for comment yesterday.
Some cheeky commentators and
one anonymous diplomat quoted in The New York Times, have suggested
Cambodia was a little too close to cash-riddled China rather than its
ASEAN brothers during the talks.
Monirath, the son of Cambodian
Foreign Minister Hor Namhong, suggested in his article yesterday that
“some media have gone as far as to try to paint a bleak picture of
Cambodia’s Chairmanship of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations”,
and defended the ASEAN chair’s actions during the summit.
“Cambodia
tried to prevent the dispute from further flaring up and to avoid
adding fuel to the fire,” he said in the “clarification” published by
the Japanese news outlet.
But this latest retort came just two
days after Phnom Penh’s ambassador to Manila was publicly summonsed by
the Philippines to explain what they deemed was an inflammatory letter
to the editor published in the Philippines Star and is, if anything,
only likely to exacerbate increasingly heated diplomatic relations.
Both
the Cambodian Foreign Ministry and the Philippines Department of
Foreign Affairs have engaged in public finger pointing, far away from
the private corridors of civil diplomatic banter, variously accusing
each other of “dirty politics”, “souring the mood” and “sabotage” at the
summit.
Political analyst Lao Mong Hay said he was disappointed
by the language and the fact that after Indonesian Foreign Minister
Marty Natalegawa flew around the region to negotiate a face-saving ASEAN
statement of principles on the South China Sea, the feud has continued.
“It seems at the foreign affairs level, Indonesia has done
something positive already but it has not been able to unite or reunite
and reconcile the two sides,” he said.
“I think we have talked
enough about it [and] we should move on after this ASEAN statement;
otherwise, you are playing into the Chinese hands.”
An
undersecretary at the Indonesia Embassy in Phnom Penh who declined to be
named, said the country “was always ready to step in whenever they need
us to step in, but we still need for both sides to agree”.
ASEAN
prides itself on a special relationship between members, dubbed the
“ASEAN way” but one might wonder if the post-summit events have been an
example of diplomacy the normal way or the ASEAN way.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment