Anti-Sarawak dam rallies held in Australia, Malaysia
Rowena Dela Rosa Yoon, Sep 27, 2013
Separate rallies are taking place in Australia and Malaysia in
a collective effort to pressure the Malaysian government to stop the
construction of 12 mega-dams that are underway in Sarawak.
In Malaysia, anti-dam protesters demonstrated outside Kuala Lumpur Parliament
building on Thursday. They held signs against the Murum Dam and Baram
Dam and called on the Malaysian government to respect indigenous
peoples’ demands for a fair settlement of their rights.
In Murum, Sarawak,
over 100 Penan leaders staged a blockade to stop the flow of traffic to
the dam site on the same day. Their aim was to get the attention of the
Malaysian government and the state owned-power company, Sarawak Energy,
and pressure them to stop the mega-dam projects.
The protesters hope they got the message across: Respect indigenous
and human rights and provide appropriate compensation for the loss of
their lands and homes.
Carrying signs, and food and bedding, they have taken over the only
road to and from the dam site and are not allowing any traffic through.
Brihannala Morgan, director of the Borneo Project,
said in a press statement that this dam, one of 12 mega dams planned
across the region, will drown over 2,750 sq km of forest and
traditionally owned land.
This is the second blockade that the Penan people of the Murum area
have erected. The first blockade was in September 2012 when the Penan of
Long Wat village held a blockade that delayed construction of the dam
for over a month.
Sarawak Energy promised the Penan compensation and prime land for
relocation, but failed to deliver on its promises. Instead, they are
relocating the Penan to swampy areas that are unable to support their
traditional agricultural practices and way of life.
Just before impoundment began earlier this month, the longhouse of
Long Wat village was burned by Sarawak Energy workers. Details are still
forthcoming, yet it appears that this case of arson was committed
without the prior knowledge of the villagers.
“The world needs to stand up and take action against such rampant
abuse of power,” said Morgan, adding, “The plight of the Penan is a
fundamental example of corporate greed steamrolling human rights.”
According to SAVE-Rivers, the statewide network of anti-dam
activists, the Penan are demanding RM 50,000 per family (about US
$15,500), as well as 25 hectares of land, a 10 per cent share in the
profits from the Murum Dam, as well as full compensation for their lost
land and resources.
The Murum Dam is one of 12 mega dams slated to be built in Malaysian
Borneo by 2020. The dam will produce 944 MW of energy, energy that
currently has no purchasers or identified demand. On-the-ground efforts,
such as SAVE-Rivers, work to coordinate indigenous-led resistance
against dam expansion and massive resettlement.
Protest held in Hobart
The Huon Valley Environment Centre (HVEC) hosted a separate
protest at the at Hydro Tasmania head office in a show solidarity with
the indigenous people of Murum, Sarawak.
Jenny Weber, spokeswoman of the HVEC, said Sarawak faces the dire
consequences in light of the government’s failure to uphold human
rights.
“Flooding of Murum Dam begun last Saturday, while six out of seven
villages remain in the region, and more than 100 Penan people blockade
at the Murum dam site,” she said.
Australia-owned Hydro Tasmania is implicated in the human and environmental violations by assisting Sarawak Energy.
The dam project in the area is reported to have caused flooding on
the lands of indigenous peoples at Murum, although most of the affected
villagers have not been resettled and their demands not addressed.
Weber also implicated Sarawak Energy workers as the suspected
arsonist in a Penan village. “We have been informed that one Penan
village was burnt down in a case of suspected arson by Sarawak Energy
workers.” Other allegations include communities reporting the loss
of fishing boats due to the impoundment. An estimated 1500 Penan and 80
Kenyah natives will lose their homes due to the Murum dam
impoundment, Weber said.
“The construction of Murum dam would not have been possible without
support from Western engineers and managers. Hydro Tasmania, have staff
secondments in Sarawak, including engineer Andrew Pattle who directed
the Murum dam construction. Hydro Tasmania is responsible for the
displacement of indigenous peoples from their traditional lands. We
condemn Hydro Tasmania, as they continue to assist human rights
violations and environmentally destructive practices in Sarawak,” Weber
said.
“We are asking Hydro Tasmania and our Tasmanian Government to stop
supporting the Sarawak government in their oppression of indigenous
people in Sarawak, stop implicating our state in this humanitarian
crisis. As long as Tasmania assists the Sarawak regime they are
culpable for assisting the Sarawak government’s human rights
violations. People of Murum, Sarawak and International NGOs are calling
for urgent intervention and an immediate stop of the Murum dam
impoundment,” Weber said.
Former Australian Greens Senator Bob Brown flew to Kuching,
the capital of the Malaysian state of Sarawak, earlier this year to
give his backing to a large group of local communities opposing the
controversial mega dam projects in the region.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Thursday, September 26, 2013
Cambodia: Human rights groups condemn excessive use of force
Cambodia: Human rights groups condemn excessive use of force
Clothilde Le Coz, Sep 25, 2013
It was 20 years on September 24 since the Cambodian Constitution was first signed, marking the end of the UN transitional authority in the country (Untac). Today’s Constitution was drafted in July and August 1993 by 12 persons. One of them told the local press on Tuesday that, while the “essentials for democracy” are in the text, its implementation has been “completely diverted from its goal”.
Under the Constitution, the King names a representative of the party gaining the most parliamentary seats to form a government. This is how Hun Sen was appointed by King Norodom Sihamoni to do so. However, the Constitution requires 50% of the votes of the National Assembly to confirm the new government. On Tuesday, a truncated National Assembly of 68 members re-elected Mr. Hun Sen with a new mandate as Cambodian Prime Minister for the next five years, as 68 does represent more than half the seats. Sam Rainsy, one of the leaders of the CNRP, called the Constitution a “big disappointment”, echoing the opinion of the lawmaker who participated in the drafting process of the Constitution.
Elected members of the main opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP) led by Sam Rainsy and Khem Sokha, have boycotted the National Assembly this week, stating that authorities have not held any inquiry about the massive electoral frauds and calling the meeting “a violation of the Constitution”. From September 7-17, the CNRP held a number of non violent demonstrations in Phnom Penh to ask for further investigations into the results. According to Transparency International, the CPP should have won these elections with 48.9% of the votes and the CNRP with 44.2%, showing that the competition between the two parties is tighter than it actually seems and stating that the official results announced on September 8 might not be reflective of people’s will because of widespread irregularities.
A number of incidents have occurred in recent weeks that highlight the tensions surrounding the election result. On September 15 security forces fired at civilians in Phnom Penh, killing one person and wounding several others. These practices have been denounced by Human Rights Watch.
On September 20, hundreds of armed security forces dispersed a peaceful gathering led by CNRP official Prince Sisowath Thomico, who was on hunger strike and accompanied by a group of Buddhist monks and other supporters. Two days later, at the same place, police and gendarmes armed with guns as well as civilian auxiliaries with tasers and slingshots broke up a peaceful vigil by representatives of people evicted from their homes in Phnom Penh. The participants were reiterating their demand for electoral fairness and calling for the release of imprisoned Boeng Kak housing rights activist Yorm Bopha. At least 10 community members were injured and seven journalists attacked.
These events were condemned on September 24 by a group of five NGOs – including HRW and Amnesty International – denouncing “the authorities’ unnecessary and excessive use of force” and urging “foreign governments and the United Nations [to] speak out and condemn violations of the right to peaceful assembly and related rights”. The Oversees Press Club of Cambodia (OPCC) also condemned the attacks against local and foreign journalists.
Clothilde Le Coz, Sep 25, 2013
It was 20 years on September 24 since the Cambodian Constitution was first signed, marking the end of the UN transitional authority in the country (Untac). Today’s Constitution was drafted in July and August 1993 by 12 persons. One of them told the local press on Tuesday that, while the “essentials for democracy” are in the text, its implementation has been “completely diverted from its goal”.
Under the Constitution, the King names a representative of the party gaining the most parliamentary seats to form a government. This is how Hun Sen was appointed by King Norodom Sihamoni to do so. However, the Constitution requires 50% of the votes of the National Assembly to confirm the new government. On Tuesday, a truncated National Assembly of 68 members re-elected Mr. Hun Sen with a new mandate as Cambodian Prime Minister for the next five years, as 68 does represent more than half the seats. Sam Rainsy, one of the leaders of the CNRP, called the Constitution a “big disappointment”, echoing the opinion of the lawmaker who participated in the drafting process of the Constitution.
Elected members of the main opposition Cambodian National Rescue Party (CNRP) led by Sam Rainsy and Khem Sokha, have boycotted the National Assembly this week, stating that authorities have not held any inquiry about the massive electoral frauds and calling the meeting “a violation of the Constitution”. From September 7-17, the CNRP held a number of non violent demonstrations in Phnom Penh to ask for further investigations into the results. According to Transparency International, the CPP should have won these elections with 48.9% of the votes and the CNRP with 44.2%, showing that the competition between the two parties is tighter than it actually seems and stating that the official results announced on September 8 might not be reflective of people’s will because of widespread irregularities.
A number of incidents have occurred in recent weeks that highlight the tensions surrounding the election result. On September 15 security forces fired at civilians in Phnom Penh, killing one person and wounding several others. These practices have been denounced by Human Rights Watch.
On September 20, hundreds of armed security forces dispersed a peaceful gathering led by CNRP official Prince Sisowath Thomico, who was on hunger strike and accompanied by a group of Buddhist monks and other supporters. Two days later, at the same place, police and gendarmes armed with guns as well as civilian auxiliaries with tasers and slingshots broke up a peaceful vigil by representatives of people evicted from their homes in Phnom Penh. The participants were reiterating their demand for electoral fairness and calling for the release of imprisoned Boeng Kak housing rights activist Yorm Bopha. At least 10 community members were injured and seven journalists attacked.
These events were condemned on September 24 by a group of five NGOs – including HRW and Amnesty International – denouncing “the authorities’ unnecessary and excessive use of force” and urging “foreign governments and the United Nations [to] speak out and condemn violations of the right to peaceful assembly and related rights”. The Oversees Press Club of Cambodia (OPCC) also condemned the attacks against local and foreign journalists.
Monday, September 9, 2013
Australia: New gov’t will be disastrous for environment, warns expert | Asian Correspondent
Australia: New gov’t will be disastrous for environment, warns expert | Asian Correspondent
Rowena Dela Rosa Yoon Sep 09, 2013
A day after Tony Abbott was elected as the new Prime Minister of Australia, conservation groups are already worrying about the future of environmental protection and sustainability in the country.
Under the new “management”, a term used by Abbott in his acceptance speech at the Four Seasons Hotel in Sydney, his government will put environmental issues on the back burner to get the business back on track.
Abbott won Saturday’s Federal Election to become Australia’s 28th prime minister, beating Kevin Rudd in an overwhelming victory.
In a reaction to his election, however, Emeritus Professor Ian Lowe from the School of Science, Griffith University said Australia’s newly elected government will be disastrous for the environment. He finds the Coalition Government’s policies on environment to be depressing, The Conversation reports.
Under the Liberal Party’s plan, Abbott will seek to abolish the carbon tax immediately, which he considers toxic and destructive for Australian businesses. The new PM also vowed to suspend the operation of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.
Citing New South Wales as an example of bad business affected by carbon tax, Premiere Barry O’Farrell has made it clear that the state’s black coal-fired power stations will suffer a loss in value of at least $5 billion because of the carbon tax.
Abbott will also abolish the mining tax which he claims undermines investor confidence in Australia as an investment destination and as a secure “supplier of resources.” By scrapping the tax, the Coalition aims to “restore confidence, stability and security for the industry, allowing it to thrive, create jobs and contribute to the prosperity of all Australians.”
Green groups have been alarmed at the Coalition’s plan to implement a One-Stop-Shop Environmental Approvals Process. The process will cut green tape and will fast-track approvals of new mining and other projects. Once it gives green light to the petition lodged by the Business Council of Australia, the Coalition will offer State and Territory governments the opportunity to act as a one-stop-shop for environmental approvals. The States and Territories would then administer a single approvals process including approvals under Commonwealth legislation such as the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. The Environment Defenders Office has already released a report that finds the One-Stop-Shop a process to streamline the process of environmental destruction. Read related article here.
Lowe said Abbott’s proposal will turn the clock back 30 years on environmental protection.
“Since the Hawke government blocked the proposed Franklin Dam, successive governments – ALP and Coalition – have curbed the worst excesses of growth-oriented states, which are prepared to approve irresponsible developments. Even our National Parks are no longer safe,” he said.
Other plans in the Coalition pipeline include a go for mineral exploration activities; agricultural land exploration for seam coal gas; approval of uranium exports to India; examination of the potential of thorium as an energy source for export; and a review of the former government’s White Paper on energy and resources, among other things.
Relevant links to the new government’s policies are here, including resources and energy plans.
Rowena Dela Rosa Yoon Sep 09, 2013
A day after Tony Abbott was elected as the new Prime Minister of Australia, conservation groups are already worrying about the future of environmental protection and sustainability in the country.
Under the new “management”, a term used by Abbott in his acceptance speech at the Four Seasons Hotel in Sydney, his government will put environmental issues on the back burner to get the business back on track.
Abbott won Saturday’s Federal Election to become Australia’s 28th prime minister, beating Kevin Rudd in an overwhelming victory.
In a reaction to his election, however, Emeritus Professor Ian Lowe from the School of Science, Griffith University said Australia’s newly elected government will be disastrous for the environment. He finds the Coalition Government’s policies on environment to be depressing, The Conversation reports.
Under the Liberal Party’s plan, Abbott will seek to abolish the carbon tax immediately, which he considers toxic and destructive for Australian businesses. The new PM also vowed to suspend the operation of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation.
Citing New South Wales as an example of bad business affected by carbon tax, Premiere Barry O’Farrell has made it clear that the state’s black coal-fired power stations will suffer a loss in value of at least $5 billion because of the carbon tax.
Abbott will also abolish the mining tax which he claims undermines investor confidence in Australia as an investment destination and as a secure “supplier of resources.” By scrapping the tax, the Coalition aims to “restore confidence, stability and security for the industry, allowing it to thrive, create jobs and contribute to the prosperity of all Australians.”
Green groups have been alarmed at the Coalition’s plan to implement a One-Stop-Shop Environmental Approvals Process. The process will cut green tape and will fast-track approvals of new mining and other projects. Once it gives green light to the petition lodged by the Business Council of Australia, the Coalition will offer State and Territory governments the opportunity to act as a one-stop-shop for environmental approvals. The States and Territories would then administer a single approvals process including approvals under Commonwealth legislation such as the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. The Environment Defenders Office has already released a report that finds the One-Stop-Shop a process to streamline the process of environmental destruction. Read related article here.
Lowe said Abbott’s proposal will turn the clock back 30 years on environmental protection.
“Since the Hawke government blocked the proposed Franklin Dam, successive governments – ALP and Coalition – have curbed the worst excesses of growth-oriented states, which are prepared to approve irresponsible developments. Even our National Parks are no longer safe,” he said.
Other plans in the Coalition pipeline include a go for mineral exploration activities; agricultural land exploration for seam coal gas; approval of uranium exports to India; examination of the potential of thorium as an energy source for export; and a review of the former government’s White Paper on energy and resources, among other things.
Relevant links to the new government’s policies are here, including resources and energy plans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)