Wednesday, February 24, 2010

1,000 Americans Slain in Operation Enduring Freedom So Far -- News from Antiwar.com

1,000 Americans Slain in Operation Enduring Freedom So Far -- News from Antiwar.com

1,000 Americans Slain in Operation Enduring Freedom So Far

8+ Year Operation Covers Afghan War, Three Other Smaller Conflicts

by Jason Ditz, February 23, 2010

Casualty reports by ICasualties.org show that 1,000 American soldiers have been killed so far in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), a blanket term for several US military operations ongoing since 2001.

Though some media outlets incorrectly reported that the number of troops killed were the toll for only the Afghan War, OEF actually encompasses not only the Afghan War, but three smaller US military operations, in the Philippines, Horn of Africa, and Trans Sahara.

But the vast majority of the deaths, some 926, were in Afghanistan. The US military operation in Afghanistan has seen record death tolls year after year, including 316 in 2009. It is widely expected that 2010 will be an even deadlier year.

In addition to the 1,000 American soldiers lost in OEF, several hundred soldiers from Britain and other NATO nations were also killed. Over 4,300 US soldiers also died in the Iraq War since that time.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Russia to supply Iran with S-300 defense systems - Haaretz - Israel News

Russia to supply Iran with S-300 defense systems - Haaretz - Israel News

By Reuters, Last update - 22:30 19/02/2010

Russia intends to fulfill a contract to supply S-300 air defense missile systems to Iran, Interfax news agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov as saying on Friday.

Israel and the United States have repeatedly asked Russia to scrap a contract to sell Iran the truck-mounted S-300, which can shoot down hostile missiles or aircraft up to 150 km (90 miles) away.

"There is a contract to supply these systems to Iran, and we will fulfill it," Ryabkov told Interfax in an interview. "Delays (with deliveries) are linked to technical problems with adjusting these systems," he added.

He also cautioned against politicizing Russia's arms exports to Iran.

"It is absolutely incorrect to put the emphasis on the issue of S-300 supplies... and to turn it into a major problem, to say nothing of linking it to the discussion on restoring trust in the purely peaceful character of Iran's nuclear program," Ryabkov said.

The possible sale of the S-300s, which could protect Iran's nuclear facilities against air strikes, is an extremely sensitive issue in Russia's relations with Israel.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited Moscow this week to press the Kremlin to back tougher sanctions against Iran.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Protests, Boycott Threats Cast Doubt on Iraqi Election -- News from Antiwar.com

Protests, Boycott Threats Cast Doubt on Iraqi Election -- News from Antiwar.com

Can March Vote Be Credible Without Sunnis or Secularists?

by Jason Ditz, February 14, 2010

With Iraq’s largest secularist coalition formally suspending its campaign and announcing a boycott of the March 7 parliamentary election and protests among Sunnis hinting at a large-scale boycott, Iraq’s vote is becoming increasingly irrelevant to many.

Ahmed Chalabi

Indeed, beyond the Kurdish factions, who will predictably sweep the northern regions of the country, the election is shaping up to be a battle against the Shi’ite religious Dawa Party of Prime Minister Maliki, the Shi’ite religious bloc led by the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, and the Shi’ite religious bloc led by Ahmed Chalabi.

How credible can the election be without the Sunni Arabs or the secularist Shi’ites? It remains to be seen, but the banning of 400-some-odd candidates on allegations of “Ba’athist ties” has the potential to do serious harm to hopes of sectarian reconciliation in the nation, and has left the Sunnis with a growing sense that they are unwelcome in the nation, at least as a political force.

Ahmed Chalabi is unrepentant over the bannings, however, accusing the US of interfering in the election process. Speaking on Iran’s state media yesterday, Chalabi went so far as to accuse the US of plotting to install banned Sunni MP Saleh al-Mutlaq and others as a new Ba’athist regime as part of a plan aimed at a joint US-Iraqi invasion of Iran. Chalabi played a key role in convincing the US to invade Iraq in the first place.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Hiroshima will reassess reach of 'black rain' | The Japan Times Online

Hiroshima will reassess reach of 'black rain' | The Japan Times Online

Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2010

Hiroshima will reassess reach of 'black rain'

HIROSHIMA (Kyodo) The Hiroshima Municipal Government said Tuesday it will re-examine the extent of the radioactive "black rain" that fell after the 1945 U.S. atomic bombing of the city.

The two-year study beginning in April is the first such review in about 20 years, the city said.

Using computerized weather simulations, the analysis aims to provide new evidence to the city and atomic bomb survivors in their efforts to persuade the central government to offer more free medical checkups to people who were exposed to the contaminated rain, according to officials.

A large-scale survey of atomic bomb survivors in 2008 indicated that black rain may have fallen in an area at least double the size designated by the central government.

The municipal government said it has budgeted about ¥9.8 million for the study in its initial plan for fiscal 2010, which begins in April.

A panel of experts set up in 1988 by the city and the Hiroshima Prefectural Government concluded in 1991 that the area affected by black rain was almost identical to that identified by the central government.

The finding has since been questioned by other experts, including meteorologists, who pointed out problems with the model, including the altitude of the atomic cloud and the quantity of radioactive materials produced by the Aug. 6, 1945, explosion.

The new study will start by discussing with experts those variables and others, such as the weather on the day of the bombing and the drifting of smoke from fires, officials said.

Antinuclear meeting

NAGASAKI (Kyodo) An international antinuclear conference in Nagasaki has urged countries with nuclear arms to halt further development of the weapons.

The fourth Nagasaki Global Citizens' Assembly for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons ended Monday by adopting the "Nagasaki Appeal," which also asked world leaders, including U.S. President Barack Obama, to visit Hiroshima and Nagasaki to see the aftermath of the A-bombs.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

AP Article Fuels Iran War Hysteria -- News from Antiwar.com

AP Article Fuels Iran War Hysteria -- News from Antiwar.com

Article Speculates Medical Uranium Enrichment a Weapons Plot

by Jason Ditz, February 08, 2010

In a widely-circulated article which has further fueled Western hysteria about the prospect of an imminent war with Iran, the Associated Press today claimed that Iran’s uranium enrichment program move, an effort to produce medical isotopes which are rapidly running out in the nation, was a secret plot to build nuclear weapons.

The article, entitled “Iran moves closer to nuke warhead capacity,” claims that Iran had informed the IAEA that it “will increase its ability to make nuclear warheads,” an allegation which is not only unsupported by fact but even goes beyond the ample bellicose Western statements quoted in the piece.

In fact the IAEA’s own confirmation of the Iranian statement says simply that Iran is planning to begin efforts for “production of less than 20 percent enriched uranium,” noted by the AP piece as “just below the threshold for high enriched uranium” but actually well short of the 90 percent plus needed for weapons grade material.

Iran has made it clear than the approximately 20 percent enriched uranium will be used in an effort to produce fuel rods for its US-build Tehran reactor, needed in the creation of medical isotopes. The move came as efforts for a third party enrichment deal, which would provide Iran with access to fuel rods from overseas, has stalled amid international ire.

But the AP piece glossed over Iran’s acceptance of the third party enrichment deal last week, a move which it claims was “welcomed internationally” but which was actually roundly condemned by Western officials who claimed that accepting their own demands was an effort to “stall.”

In fact this was the key to Iran’s move, as German officials insisted that Iran’s acceptance couldn’t be accepted, and that they would have to start a new round of negotiations, something Western officials have repeatedly rejected. With the prospect for a third-party enrichment deal at best speculative going forward, Iran was left with the choice of abandoning nuclear medicine treatments for thousands of patients or pushing forward with efforts to become self-sufficient in the process.

And while British officials insisted, and the AP was quick to point out, that they doubt Iran’s capability to actually produce the fuel rods, other experts said they would likely be able to, and Iran seemed to have few options but to try.

At the end of the day though, the biggest problem with the piece was the reference to “nuke warheads,” a technology which Iran isn’t even accused of moving forward. If Iran isn’t even capable of making fuel rods for medical reactors out of 20 percent enriched uranium it is hoping to produce, it is absolutely absurd and irresponsible to claim that Iran is nearing the capability of producing nuclear-capable warheads, which would require not only weapons-grade uranium which they are not producing, but advanced delivery systems.

With Iran’s enrichment facilities under 24-hour IAEA surveillance, they will be able to confirm that neither Iran’s current 3.5 percent uranium or its speculative 20 percent uranium is diverted to anything but civilian purposes. The surveillance would also instantly confirm if Iran began enriching uranium beyond 20 percent, meaning the threat of Iran suddenly acquiring a nuclear weapon is entirely illusory. Western officials, and some writers at the Associated Press, however, see fit to look beyond the lack of concrete threats and instead rely on public fear of the unknown to make the case for escalating tensions beyond all reason, and bringing the West ever closer to a needless war with Iran.

Saturday, February 6, 2010

At Least 41 Pilgrims Killed in Karbala Attacks -- News from Antiwar.com

At Least 41 Pilgrims Killed in Karbala Attacks -- News from Antiwar.com

by Jason Ditz, February 05, 2010

A pair of major attacks today in the city of Karbala killed at least 41 pilgrims and left 144 others wounded. It was the third major strike against pilgrims heading to Karbala for Arba’een this week.

Exact details of the attacks on the Shi’ite religious ceremony were still emerging, but today’s attacks involved a motorcycle suicide bomber. The city is in a state of panic now as tens of thousands of pilgrims wonder if more attacks are forthcoming.

A Monday attack on pilgrims heading to Karbala killed at least 54 people. Attacks in Karbala on Wednesday killed another 23. The Arba’een ceremony commemorates 40 days after the Ashoura holiday, which also saw attacks on pilgrims.

Officials had expressed optimism that violence was on the downslope in Iraq, with only 135 civilians killed in January. Between the Arba’een attacks and other assorted violence, about as many have already been killed in the first 5 days of February.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

New press secretary likens Arroyo to Marcos: Unpopular but achiever - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

New press secretary likens Arroyo to Marcos: Unpopular but achiever - INQUIRER.net, Philippine News for Filipinos

By Christian V. Esguerra
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 04:03:00 02/05/2010

MANILA, Philippines—In describing his new boss’ seeming indifference to public and media perception, Press Secretary Crispulo “Jun” Icban turns to the dictator Ferdinand Marcos for comparison.

Icban yesterday sought to explain President Macapagal-Arroyo’s refusal to engage media in unfiltered interviews, saying she “is what she is so we’ll have to leave it as she is now and let history judge her.”

He acknowledged that Ms Arroyo was unpopular particularly in Metro Manila, but said the matter should be seen in the context of the capital being traditionally the turf of the political opposition.

“In the beginning, Metro Manilans were also angry with him (Marcos),” he said. “But his image improved because he got things done.”

Icban, whose 56 years in journalism spanned eight presidents, said Marcos’ image improved through the years once the public began comparing him with his successors and realized he was able to build many infrastructure projects.

Asked if he expected the same thing to happen in the case of Ms Arroyo, he said: “I think so.”

“Like Marcos and everybody else, she will be judged by what she achieved within her time,” he said.

Marcos was ousted in the Edsa People Power Revolution in 1986. He fled with his family to Hawaii where he died on Sept. 28, 1989.

Arroyo no communicator

Icban said Ms Arroyo’s nine-year tenure in office should be gauged more for its achievements than for her ability to communicate.

“It only helps a politician to be good at communication,” he said. “But in the end, it would be the achievement and perhaps, she is giving more importance on achievements than communication. So, we, as (her) communicators, will have to live with that.”

In her last Christmas party with the MalacaƱang Press Corps in December, Ms Arroyo apologized for being a “difficult subject to cover” and promised to be more open to journalists.

Charm offensive

Late last month, her image-builders came up with a new tack to promote her so-called accomplishments and endear her to the media in the process—a charm offensive involving visits to private media outlets on top of publishing advertisements trumpeting her administration’s achievements.

But some things apparently didn’t change. So far in her media tours, she has limited questions and refused to tackle political and controversial issues.

Set to walk out

In a Bacolod sortie on Wednesday, she threatened to walk out over a question about the poor ratings of the administration’s standard-bearer.

Icban, who had joined her on that trip, explained: “She decided she just wanted to talk about the cyber corridor and she did not want to deviate from that, so that was the plan.”

Asked if it would be better if Ms Arroyo were to answer more questions later on, he said:

“She has her own way and she became President because of that. Maybe that is the reason she became President … She is very strong-willed and maybe part of her success in getting all these people to come and join the President is her strong will. Some people want somebody like that.”