Thursday, February 2, 2012

3 Abu Sayyaf leaders, 12 followers killed in Sulu air raid

3 terrorist leaders, 12 followers killed in Sulu air raid
,

MANILA, Philippines—At least 15 Islamic extremists, including three senior leaders, were killed in an air raid in Parang town in Sulu at dawn Thursday.

Abu Sayyaf commander Umbra Jumdail, also known as Abu Pula, and Jemaah Islamiyah leaders Zulkifli bin Hir or Marwan, and Abdullah Ali, who uses the guerrilla name Muawiyah Anjala, were the senior leaders killed in the air strikes, said military spokesman Colonel Arnulfo Burgos.

Zulkifli is a Malaysian leader of Jemaah Islamiyah, the militant organization blamed for some of Southeast Asia’s deadliest terrorist attacks including the 2002 Bali bombings which killed more than 200 people.

Zulkifli, an explosive expert, was the over-all leader of the JI in the Philippines, said Burgos.

The US government has offered $5 million and P7.4 million reward from the DND and DILG for Zulkifli’s capture.

Muawiyah, who goes by many aliases, is a Singaporean member of JI who fled to the Philippines shortly after the Bali bombings, according to a Philippine military intelligence officer.

He was a former member of the Singaporean military with the rank of Major. He was also a JI member affiliated with the Abu Sayyaf and had contact with Omar Patek, Burgos said. The US offered a US$50,000 reward for his arrest.

Jumdail, a member of the Tausug ethnic group, is a founder and one of the most senior figures of the Abu Sayyaf group, which was established in Mindanao in the 1990s with seed money from Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda-network.

He had warrants of arrest for 21 counts of kidnapping and serious illegal detention and was involved in the 2000 kidnapping in Sipadan, Malaysia and the 2001 kidnapping in Dos Palmas resort in Palawan. A P7.4 million bounty from the Department of National Defense and Deparment of Interior and Local Government, and P$140,000 reward from the US were offered for his capture.

In a press briefing, Burgos said that the composite unit composed of elite troops of the Philippine Army, Philippine Navy, Philippine Air Force first launched an air strike in Barangay Duyan Kabau, Parang town in Sulu to “soften the target” at around 3 a.m. Thursday.

The attack lasted only for a few seconds before troops stormed the terror group’s temporary camp, Burgos said.
The air strikes were conducted following tips of civilians that there were Abu Sayyaf and JI members in the area, Burgos said. He said there were also reports that 30 terrorists, including six foreign JI members, arrived in Sulu last December.

“Sagot ito sa all-out justice campaign,” Burgos said, referring to the security campaign launched by the Aquino government against lawless elements last 2011.
Burgos said that no civilians were hurt in the operations, adding that this was a “thorough and deliberate” attack done after “months of intelligence gathering”.
“We want to assure the people of Sulu that the operation conducted was aimed against known members of the terrorist groups–Abu Sayyaf and Jemaah Islamiyah– who intends to expand their presence in Mindanao,” Burgos added.

The Abu Sayyaf is blamed for the worst terrorist attacks in the Philippines, including the bombing of a ferry in Manila that killed more than 100 people, as well as a spate of kidnappings in the remote and Muslim-populated south.

A rotating force of 600 US Special Forces has been stationed in Mindanao for a decade to help train local troops in how to combat Islamic militants.

The US forces are only allowed to advise the Filipino soldiers, and are banned from having a combat role.

The Abu Sayyaf is well-known to have given refuge to Islamic militants from around the region such as JI leaders, who in turn have helped with training followers such as bomb-making skills. With a report from Julie S. Alipala, Inquirer Mindanao

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Thai ranger killed, policeman wounded in far South

Thai ranger killed, policeman wounded in far South
Bangkok Post, 1 February 2012

The policeman was attacked by two gunmen in Cho Airong district of Narathiwat province this afternoon.

Pol Lt Kittikhun Pattamanusorn of Cho Airong police station said Pol Sr Sgt-Maj Veerachai Yudam, 40, was attacked while returning home on his motorcycle on the Yaning-Cho Airong road in tambon Chuap by two men on another motorcycle about 1.40pm.

The two men, each armed with a pistol, opened fire at him. One of the shots hit him in the left ribcage and another in the thigh, wounding him seriously.

Pol Sr Sgt-Maj Veerachai returned fire with his 11mm pistol and his attackers fled. He was admitted to Cho Airong hospital.

In Pattani's Khok Pho district, a paramilitary ranger was killed in a drive-by shooting this morning.

Khok Pho police chief Rapeepong Sukpaiboon said the victim was identified as ranger Thanong Sinthu, 40, attached to Ingkayuth Borihan military camp in Pattani's Nong Chok district.

Thanong was driving his motorcycle to his office on Naket-Pattani road at Ban Chamao in tambon Naket of Khok Pho when a gunman on another motorcycle fired at him three times and then fled, according to police.

The ranger took three bullets in his back and died on the spot, said Pol Col Rapeepong.

Police blamed separatist militants.

More than 4,500 people have been killed and about 9,000 hurt in the three southern border provinces of Narathiwat, Pattani and Yala since the violence erupted afresh in January 2004.

Thai defence minister, Sukumpol, Lese majeste reform not newsworthy

Sukumpol: Lese majeste reform not newsworthy
Bangkok Post, 1 February 2012

The media should not give so much importance to the group of law academics who want the lese majese law amended, Defence Minister Sukumpol Suwanatat said Wednesday.

"It is the media that monitors and releases news, and if the media didn't give any value to the issue [lese majeste] it would be over soon.

"The more the media talks about the high institution, the more impact it will have. I ask the media not to make the issue (lese majeste reform) a news story too often," ACM Sukumpol said.

Defence Minister Sukumpol Suwanatat

He said the army had been closely following the movements to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code relating to lese majeste.

Pheu Thai party list MP and spokesman Prompong Nopparit called on the Nitirat group of law lecturers from Thammasat University to stop being stubborn about wanting the lese majeste law changed.

Since the Nitirat group proposed that Section 112 of the Criminal Code and Article 8 of the constitution should be amended, it had faced strong social opposition, he said.

"The Nitirat group should listen to the feedback, because their proposal does not benefit the people.

"When there's opposition from all sides, it's time for Nitirat to stop being stubborn and to review its position," Mr Prompong said.

The Nitirat lecturers should instead support the government's move to amend the 2007 charter, because it was drafted by a body appointed by leaders of the 2006 coup. The group would certainly garner much more support this way, he added.

"Pheu Thai is not linked with the Nitirat group but there's an ill-intentioned group of people who want to create this link in order to criticise the government and Pheu Thai," said Mr Prompong.

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut

Democrat Party spokesman Chavanond Intarakomalyasut said the government, the Pheu Thai Party and members of the red-shirt United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship were abandoning the Nitirat group's bid to amend Section 112.

At a press briefing, Mr Chavanond showed a YouTube video clip of Pheu Thai list MP Sunai Julapongsathorn giving a speech on a UDD stage and there was a clear sign saying "We Don't Want Section 112" on the same stage.

The opposition spokesman also showed another YouTube video clip showing UDD chairwoman Thida Thavornseth saying that the red-shirt group comprises two arms - the right arm is the red-shirt supporters, and the left is the Nitirat group.

He said the ties between the government, Pheu Thai, red-shirt members, "the person living in Dubai" and the Nitirat group was clear.

This relationship would create benefits for both sides as former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra wanted the consequences of the 2006 coup removed while the Nitirat group wanted amendments to the lese majeste law.

"It's a perfect combination between a capitalist group and lunatic academics," said the Democrat spokesman said.

Taliban Leadership: No Talks With Karzai Govt. -- News from Antiwar.com

Taliban Leadership: No Talks With Karzai Govt. -- News from Antiwar.com
Jason Ditz, January 31, 2012

With no meaningful role for the Afghan government in US-Taliban peace talks, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has been desperate to kick-start separate peace talks with the Taliban over the past few days, even approaching Pakistan with the hope that it could facilitate such a meeting.

The Taliban has other ideas, however. New reports to the Afghan Islamic Press (AIP) reveal that the Taliban central leadership council has confirmed plans for limited US talks. The council added that it would have nothing to do with the “illegal and powerless” Karzai government.

This is in keeping with long-standing Taliban policy. Its leadership has argued that Karzai’s government exists only at the pleasure of 100,000+ NATO occupation forces with no real power or support of its own.

Even the US talks, according to the AIP report, will be limited to prisoner exchanges for the time being. The US has reiterated the possibility of releasing detainees from Guantanamo Bay, saying this might provide an incentive for broadening the peace talks. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says no decision has been made on the releases.

Iran-IAEA Talks ‘Constructive,’ as US-Israel Keep Aggressive Postures -- News from Antiwar.com

Iran-IAEA Talks ‘Constructive,’ as US-Israel Keep Aggressive Postures -- News from Antiwar.com
John Glaser, January 31, 2012

The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) three day negotiations with the Iranian government were “constructive,” according to Iranian news media.


“The negotiations between the two sides were held in a positive and constructive atmosphere,” an IAEA official was reported as saying. The two sides agreed to hold additional talks in the future.

The IAEA inspectors met with Iranian officials to discuss the alleged military dimension to Iran’s nuclear program. Some reports claimed that the IAEA team was granted permission to inspect all of Iran’s nuclear sites, even though that was not the purpose of the visit.

Still, U.S. and Israeli officials continue to discuss the potential for a preemptive military strike on Iran. The head of Israel’s intelligence service secretly visited Washington last week to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, and Senator Dianne Feinstein referred to that visit during a committee hearing on Tuesday in the context of a question about the likelihood of possible pre-emptive military action by Israel against Iran’s nuclear sites.

Israeli President Shimon Peres on Tuesday reiterated that “no option should be excluded against the program of Iran, which seeks to acquire weapons of mass destruction.”

Iran denies any intention to build nuclear weapons and there is yet no evidence of any nuclear weapons program. All 16 U.S. intelligence agencies concluded in 2007, and again in 2011, that there is no military dimension to Iran’s nuclear program. And despite the hyperbolic reporting on it, the latest report from the IAEA said, “the Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material.”

As Adm. Dennis Blair, Obama’s former director of national intelligence, told Congress in March 2009, “We judge in fall 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons design and weaponization activities” but that Tehran “is keeping open the option to develop them.” This is likely a deterrence strategy, as opposed to a desire to actually attain nuclear weapons, which would gain Iran even more international condemnation.

The talks between IAEA officials and Iran will determine whether the P5+1 (the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany) can resume negotiations with Iran. But an unprecedented U.S.-led sanctions regime, a covert war, and continuous U.S.-Israeli threats may win out over diplomacy.

Palestinian Prisoner Reaches 46th Day of Hunger Strike, Refusing Water, Nearing Death | Common Dreams

Palestinian Prisoner Reaches 46th Day of Hunger Strike, Refusing Water, Nearing Death | Common Dreams
Common Dreams staff

A Palestinian prisoner held in Israel has reached his 46th day on hunger strike. Adnan Khader, 34, is protesting his detention of which he is being held without trial or charge. Israeli officials are calling it 'administrative detention'. Khader, the head of the Islamic Jihad Movement in the West Bank, was arrested on December 17 and began his hunger strike upon imprisonment.


Adnan Khader talking to the media after a meeting with the Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Muqata in the West Bank town of Ramallah June 28, 2005. (Photo: Mushir Abdelrahman / Maan Images)

After many days without food, rights group, Physicians for Human Rights, is now saying that his life is in danger.

Today, Khader began to refuse water after he was denied access to his lawyer.

* * *

Agence France-Presse reports:

"His health is deteriorating and his life will be in danger if he continues the hunger strike," [Physicians for Human Rights] said in a statement after its doctors examined him.

The Palestinian prisoners' club, which monitors inmates' wellbeing, said that Adnan was taken by ambulance on Monday from Israel's Ramla prison to a military court, where a hearing on his case was postponed until February 1.

Israel Prison Service spokeswoman Sivan Weizman told AFP that Adnan's condition was being closely monitored by prison doctors.

"If necessary he will be taken to a hospital for further treatment," she said. "All the effects of hunger-striking have been explained to him... We shall consider forced feeding if it becomes necessary."

Israeli prison authorities had described his condition as satisfactory.

* * *

The International Middle East Media Center reports:

The Palestinian Prisoner Society (PPS) reported Tuesday that the Israeli Prison Administration (IPA) informed Khader’s lawyer that he had decided to stop drinking liquids after he was prevented from meeting her.

The lawyer stated that the situation of Khader is gradually and dangerously deteriorating, and that the IPA informed her that it will be obliged to administer liquids even if he refuses.

Prison Physicians stated that, should Khader refrain from drinking any liquids, his body will likely collapse within three days, therefore, they have decided to administer liquids.

* * *

Electronic Intifada adds:

On Monday, the Israeli military court extended Adnan’s “administrative” detention and said it would hear his case on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, the Minister for Detainees in Gaza, Atallah Abu-Sabh called on Egypt, the Red Crescent and international human rights organizations to intervene urgently to save the life of Adnan, whom, he noted, has not been charged with any crime.

# # #

US Media Gobble Up US/Israel Case Against Iran | Common Dreams

US Media Gobble Up US/Israel Case Against Iran | Common Dreams
Common Dreams staff

On the same day that US Director of National Intelligence James Clapper announced that 'Iranian officials... are now more willing to conduct an attack in the United States." and a day after Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned "time was running out" for an attack on Iran, some observers -- some referencing the reporting failures that helped facilitate public support for the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 -- are sounding warnings that a 'coordinated media campaign' is being pressed on a still too pliable US news media.


The US director of national intelligence, James Clapper, gave his warning in his testimony to a Senate select committee. (Photograph: Win Mcnamee/Getty Images)

Clapper's comments came in prepared remarks delivered to a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing in Washington. Also revealed during the hearing was a previously unreported meeting between top US and Israeli intelligence officials in the US capital.

* * *

Israel's Ha'aretz reports:

Mossad chief Tamir Pardo held secret talks with top U.S. officials in recent days, cursory comments made during a public Senate hearing indicated on Tuesday.

The clandestine Washington visit was exposed during a hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, which was participated by CIA Director David Petraeus, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Dianne Feinstein, who chairs the Senate panel.

During the meeting, Feinstein asked Clapper whether or not Israel intended to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, with the top U.S. intelligence official answering that he would rather discuss the issue behind closed doors.

Feinstein then indicated that she had met Mossad chief Pardo earlier in the week in Washington, with Petraeus adding that he too met Pardo and cited what he called Israel's growing concern over Iran's nuclear ambitions.

The CIA chief also said that it was important to note that Israel considered a nuclear Iran as an existential threat.

The entire exchange was broadcast live on American television.


Israel Mossad Chief Tamir Pardo. (Photo by: Moti Milrod)

Barak's familiar saber rattling against Iran took place in Israel on Monday and echoed statements he made over the weekend at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Sky News reports:

Israel's defense minister Ehud Barak has warned that "time is urgently running out" to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

He said the Iranians are "deliberately drifting into what we call an immunity zone where practically no surgical operation could stop them."

Mr Barak was referring to Iran's efforts to move critical elements of its nuclear program - including uranium enrichment - deep underground.

* * *

As mainstream media outlets rushed to post the dramatic headlines relating to Clapper's testimony (examples: here, here, and here), Glenn Greenwald, citing Greg Miller's piece in the Washington Post and a new story about Al Qaeda in Iran by Foreign Affairs magazine, asked at Salon.com if "there’s anyone doubting that there is a concerted media-aided fear-mongering campaign aimed at Iran"?

And Patrick Cockburn, writing at CounterPunch today, argues the public relations campaign has focused on exaggerating the Iranian threat:

The way in which the growing confrontation with Iran is being sold by the US, Israel and West European leaders is deeply dishonest. The manipulation of the media and public opinion through systematic threat exaggeration is similar to the drum beat of propaganda and disinformation about Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction that preceded the invasion in 2003.

The supposed aim of imposing sanctions on Iran’s oil exports and central bank, measures officially joined by the EU, is to force Iran to abandon its nuclear program before it reaches the point where it could theoretically build a nuclear bomb. Even Israel now agrees that Iran has not yet decided to do so, but the Iranian nuclear program is still being presented as a danger to Israel and the rest of the world.

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)'s Peter Hart notes how the assertion that Iran has a nuclear weapons program is repeated in endlessly in the US mainstream media:

During an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski (1/25/12), NBC's Today host Ann Curry said this:

Well, one of the key topics that we have been hearing a lot about is all of this concern about Iran. You know what's been happening, the concerns, the tensions in the Straits of Hormuz, the concerns about Iran's rise in its efforts, everybody believes, in creating nuclear power--not only nuclear power, but nuclear weapons. Are we headed, in your view, based on all you know, for war with Iran?

Of course "everyone" doesn't believe that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. More to the point, no one has been able to show that they are.

* * *

Israeli politicians continue hinting at military action against Iran

Speaking at a conference Tuesday, Israeli President Shimon Peres said "no option should be ruled out in our dealing with the Iranian danger."
Shimon Peres at the World Economic Forum on Jan. 26, 2012 (photo: Remy Steinegger /World Economic Forum)

Ha'aretz reports:

Peres: Iran's 'evil' leaders must not be allowed to gain nuclear weapons

Iran's "evil" leaders cannot be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons, President Shimon Peres said on Tuesday, calling the Islamic Republic's nuclear ambitions the world's single most important issue.

Peres' comments came at the opening of the Herzliya Conference, which was attended by World Bank President Robert Zoellick, Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg, and former Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou.

Referring to Iran's contentious nuclear program, the president called the issue "ours and the world's central problem at this time, accusing Iran of attempting to achieve regional and "even global hegemony."

"Nuclear weapons mustn't be allowed to fall into the hands of Iran's Ayatollah regime," Peres said, calling Iran's religious leadership the "most morally corrupt regime in the world."

Hinting at the possibility of a strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, the president reiterated the Israeli stance, according to which "no option should be ruled out in our dealing with the Iranian danger. This is an existential threat

* * *

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Israel's deputy prime minister and defense minister Ehud Barak repeated the assertion that Iran has a nuclear weapons program and that tougher sanctions are needed.

The Guardian has more details on Barak's statement:

In a session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Barak said: "You can't conceive of a stable world order when Iran has nuclear weapons."

He added: "Iran is prepared to defy and deceive the whole world to turn themselves into a nuclear power. This will be the end of any conceivable anti-proliferation program. Major powers in the region will feel compelled to turn nuclear."

* * *